Elvis Presley's catalog owners sue Anthropic over 274 songs
A licensing company says Anthropic trained Claude on 274 Elvis songs without permission, a rare direct legal challenge to an AI developer from an artist's estate.
The short version
- Authentic Brands Group, which licenses Elvis's music and likeness, filed the suit on the 23rd
- It alleges Anthropic used 274 Elvis songs to train its AI models without permission
- Named songs include Can't Help Falling in Love, All Shook Up and A Little Less Conversation
- The plaintiffs seek a set sum per song, which adds up to tens of millions of dollars
- The suit says Anthropic's safeguards against copying music do not work well enough
Why it matters
Training data is one of the biggest legal risks for AI labs, along with chips. If the court sides with the Elvis owners, AI companies may have to get licenses for music before training on it. That could change what AI products cost and what they can do.
What the lawsuit says
The owners of Elvis Presley's music catalog have sued Anthropic, the maker of the Claude AI assistant. The plaintiff is Authentic Brands Group, which holds licensing rights to his music and likeness. As technews.tw reported, citing The Guardian, the suit was filed on the 23rd and was first revealed by Billboard.
It claims Anthropic infringed the copyright on 274 Elvis songs by using them to train its models. Training means feeding a model huge amounts of material so it learns patterns it can later reproduce.
The claims about Claude's output
The complaint goes beyond training. It says Claude has produced content that infringes copyright for almost every song in the catalogs available online.
It also says Anthropic added safeguards after being called out, but knew they would not reliably stop infringing output. The plaintiffs use that to argue the infringement was knowing and deliberate. These are the plaintiffs' arguments, not findings.
Why this case stands out
AI companies already face copyright complaints from the Recording Industry Association of America and from Sony, Universal and Warner Records. This case is described as one of the first major challenges brought against an AI developer directly by an artist's estate.
The outcome could set a wider precedent for how AI companies get permission to use existing music catalogs. Musicians have also worried that AI-made, low-quality tracks could crowd out human songwriters. Spotify said last week it had removed tens of millions of songs it considered AI junk from its recommendations.
What to watch
- How Anthropic responds in court, since the claims are only allegations so far
- Whether other estates and rights holders file similar suits against AI developers
Sources and links
- Reportingtechnews.tw: the article we sourced
Liked it? Say why
Add a line for other readers.
No account needed. We never show your email. Comments with links, ads or abuse are held and not shown. Your comment shows after a quick check.
Listen to the AI Wire headlines
Listen to the AI WireListen to our daily AI shows every morning: on your commute, in the shower, wherever you are
Listen to the daily showsFirst reported by technews.tw · Read the original. Written by the SI Agent News Desk from the reporting above.Written with AI from the source above. Every number is checked against the source. Spot a mistake? Corrections.
