OpenAI releases GPT-6.1 Terra with 50% lower API costs
The new model is designed for high-volume office tasks and computer use, offering significant price drops and faster speeds than previous versions.
The short version
- GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens.
- The model scores 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra on the Agents' Last Exam benchmark.
- Factual error rates dropped from 53.6% to 16.7% at low reasoning effort levels.
- It is roughly 9x cheaper per task than Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 at maximum effort.
Why it matters
For businesses and developers, this release makes it significantly more affordable to automate complex office workflows like invoice processing. It allows for high-volume automation without the high price tag of the most advanced reasoning models.
A new standard for office AI
OpenAI has officially released GPT-6.1 Terra, a new model specifically engineered for practical workplace applications. The company announced the launch on October 26, positioning the model as a faster and more affordable alternative to previous iterations. It is designed to handle a variety of everyday office tasks, including drafting proposals and interpreting technical drawings.
The model is built to excel in areas like visual reasoning, coding, and general computer use. This means it can interact with software and process visual data more effectively than standard text models. OpenAI intends for Terra to be the primary replacement for the older GPT-5.6 Terra model in many production environments.
Users can access the model through several existing platforms. It is available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu subscribers within ChatGPT Work and Codex. For developers, the model can be accessed directly through the API using the specific identifier gpt-6.1-terra.
Drastic pricing and speed gains
One of the most significant aspects of the launch is the aggressive pricing structure. OpenAI has set the standard API prices for GPT-6.1 Terra to be half the cost of both GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Specifically, the model charges $1 for every million input tokens, $0.05 for every million cached input tokens, and $5 for every million output tokens.
The model also demonstrates substantial improvements in speed and efficiency compared to its predecessors. OpenAI reports that Terra completes tasks more than three times faster than both GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. This speed makes it particularly well-suited for high-volume automation where time-to-completion is a critical factor for users.
When compared to competitors, the cost-to-performance ratio is notably high. At maximum effort, the company claims Terra is over three times as token efficient as Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5. This efficiency translates to roughly 9x lower cost per task for users performing complex operations.
Benchmark performance and accuracy
OpenAI provided several internal benchmarks to demonstrate the model's capabilities. On the Agents' Last Exam, which tests professional computer-use tasks like turning architectural drawings into 3D models, GPT-6.1 Terra scored 15 percentage points higher than GPT-5.6 Terra. This improvement occurred at medium reasoning effort while costing about one-third as much.
The model also shows significant progress in reducing factual errors. At low reasoning effort, the error rate dropped from 53.6% with the previous Terra model to just 16.7% with GPT-6.1 Terra. At maximum effort, the error rate fell by 18 percentage points to 4.3%, which is nearly identical to the rates seen in the more expensive GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol models.
Coding capabilities also saw a measurable boost during testing. On the Terminal-Bench 4.0, which evaluates command-line coding agents, Terra solved 50.3% of tasks at maximum reasoning effort. This is a major jump from the 21.5% success rate recorded for GPT-5.6 Terra, though OpenAI still suggests using higher-tier models for the most complex coding needs.
Safety and practical applications
Beyond performance, OpenAI has integrated specific safety and security features into the new model. It meets the Critical threshold in cybersecurity under the company's Preparedness Framework. It also retains the protections originally developed for GPT-6 Astra and shows stronger resistance to prompt-injection attempts than the previous Terra version.
The practical applications for this model are centered on automating tedious manual work. OpenAI highlights tasks such as reading incoming invoices and automatically entering that data into accounting software. It is also designed to handle filling out forms, editing videos, and interpreting complex technical documents for various industries.
For existing subscribers, the launch means that the same plan allowance will cover more tasks than before. Because the model is more efficient, users of ChatGPT Work and Codex can perform more actions within their current limits. Developers are encouraged to switch their model identifiers to gpt-6.1-terra to compare the cost per task against their current production workloads.
What to watch
- Whether OpenAI will eventually move GPT-6.1 Terra to the free ChatGPT tier.
- How other providers respond to the 9x lower cost-per-task claim against Claude Opus 5.5.
Try it
If you use the OpenAI API, you can switch your model identifier to gpt-6.1-terra to compare the cost per task against your current workflow.
Sources and links
- ReportinggHacks: the article we sourced
Liked it? Say why
Add a line for other readers.
No account needed. We never show your email. Comments with links, ads or abuse are held and not shown. Your comment shows after a quick check.
Listen to the AI Wire headlines
Listen to the AI WireListen to our daily AI shows every morning: on your commute, in the shower, wherever you are
Listen to the daily showsFirst reported by gHacks · Read the original. Written by the SI Agent News Desk from the reporting above.Written with AI from the source above. Every number is checked against the source. Spot a mistake? Corrections.
