OpenAI raises GPT-6 Cyber risk rating to Critical after vulnerability tests
The new model demonstrated a significant ability to find and develop exploits for major software like Linux and Firefox, prompting a higher risk classification.
The short version
- GPT-6 Cyber reproduced 1,724 Linux kernel vulnerabilities and developed working exploits for 948 of them.
- The model identified 81 new high-severity vulnerabilities in Firefox and showed 30 existing issues were worse than reported.
- OpenAI reported a 51% relative improvement on the ExploitGym benchmark compared to its previous model.
- The model stayed within authorized task boundaries in 99.93% of tests without specific deployment prompts.
- Security teams at Cisco, Calif, and CodeRabbit are already using the model for code review and vulnerability research.
Why it matters
This release shows that AI can now automate complex security research tasks that previously required deep human expertise. For users, it means faster patching of software, but it also means that malicious actors could potentially use similar tools to find and exploit flaws more quickly.
A leap in security research
OpenAI has introduced GPT-6 Cyber, a model specifically engineered to assist in security research. The company claims this model is significantly more capable at identifying and fixing software vulnerabilities than previous versions. It is designed to stay within the boundaries set by researchers while performing complex tasks.
The new model showed major gains on key cybersecurity benchmarks. Specifically, it achieved a 51% relative improvement on ExploitGym compared to GPT-5.6 Cyber. It also demonstrated a "step function improvement" when tested on its ability to remain within the scope of a specific task.
OpenAI is using its own internal evaluations to back these claims. The company notes that the model is already being used to secure real-world software. It has uncovered and validated thousands of exploits in critical codebases like Linux and Firefox.
Real-world software impact
The practical application of GPT-6 Cyber has already yielded significant results for major open-source projects. Researchers used the model to reproduce 1,724 Linux kernel vulnerabilities. Of those, the model developed working exploits for 948 of them, which is more than five times the amount produced by the previous GPT-5.6 Sol model.
In the case of the Firefox web browser, the model produced evidence for 81 new high-severity vulnerabilities. It also identified 30 known issues that were actually worse than what had been previously reported. Mozilla began landing fixes shortly after receiving these reports from the researchers.
Beyond the kernel and browsers, the model was used to find a major bug in Brotli, a tool for compressing data that Node.js relies on. This flaw could lead to remote code execution in downstream applications. These findings highlight the model's ability to navigate complex, interconnected software dependencies.
Risk ratings and safety
Because of the model's high performance in creating exploits, OpenAI has raised its cybersecurity risk rating from High to Critical. The company is aware that such power creates risks, such as an agent wandering outside of its assigned task to attack unrelated services. To counter this, OpenAI trained GPT-6 Cyber to respect limits and report results accurately.
In testing, the model avoided unauthorized actions in 99.93% of cases without a deployment prompt. When given extra guidance on safety, it remained within the permitted boundaries during every single test. This dedicated training aims to ensure that the model remains a tool for defenders rather than a weapon for attackers.
OpenAI also monitors suspicious activity to prevent malicious misuse. They check whether user actions match permissions and watch for emerging threats. For example, they monitored attempts to develop exploits against live PHP servers while simultaneously helping defenders fix the underlying flaws.
Protecting critical infrastructure
OpenAI is placing a special focus on protecting critical infrastructure like power plants and water treatment facilities. They launched a $1 billion grant program called Daybreak for Frontline Defenders to help resource-constrained teams. A new group, Daybreak Red for Critical Infrastructure, allows approved defenders to run authorized tests on sensitive systems.
The company also tightened safeguards to prevent the model from providing help that could damage equipment or endanger lives. They are monitoring sensitive-request label rates to ensure the model remains useful for legitimate research without facilitating dangerous actions. They aim to balance high block rates with the need for effective security patching.
Testing on a mock power plant showed the model could separate operational technology from IT noise on its own. It discovered two zero-days in engineering software that handles protective relay data, exposing protection settings and breaker trip logic. OpenAI plans to use this feedback to refine safeguards and form more partnerships with energy companies and national labs.
What to watch
- How other security firms respond to the 'Critical' risk rating.
- The rollout of wider API access for GPT-6 Cyber.
- Future partnerships between OpenAI and national labs for infrastructure defense.
Try it
Check the Daybreak for Frontline Defenders website to see if your organization qualifies for the $1 billion grant program.
Sources and links
- Officialreads the announcement openai.com
- Official948 Linux kernel vulnerabilitiesā openai.com
- ReportingSecurity Affairs: the article we sourced
Liked it? Say why
Add a line for other readers.
No account needed. We never show your email. Comments with links, ads or abuse are held and not shown. Your comment shows after a quick check.
Listen to the AI Wire headlines
Listen to the AI WireListen to our daily AI shows every morning: on your commute, in the shower, wherever you are
Listen to the daily showsFirst reported by Security Affairs · Read the original. Written by the SI Agent News Desk from the reporting above.Written with AI from the source above. Every number is checked against the source. Spot a mistake? Corrections.
