Huntress offers IT service firms its security platform for their own use at no cost
Security company Huntress will protect an IT firm's own devices at no cost, so the firm can test the tools before recommending them to clients.
The short version
- Any MSP can use the platform internally at no cost, even without being a Huntress partner
- The offer includes a human 24/7 SOC team and threat hunting
- Setup takes about an hour, including 30 minutes with Huntress staff
- One part, endpoint security posture management, is still in early access
- The claims come from Huntress's own post and are not independently checked
Why it matters
Small businesses often rely on an outside IT firm that holds remote access to all their systems. If that firm is breached, the harm can spread to its customers. Offers like this one are a way for those firms to test security tools on themselves, though the pitch also serves Huntress's business.
What Huntress is offering
Huntress, a security company, has launched the Neighborhood Watch Program. As huntress.com described it, the program is a set of resources meant to lift security across the wider community. The first piece is simple: any managed service provider (MSP, a company that runs IT for other businesses) can use the Huntress Managed Security Platform on its own internal devices at no cost.
The offer is open even to firms that are not Huntress partners. It includes the company's human security operations center, or SOC, a team that watches for threats around the clock. It also covers threat hunting, which means analysts actively searching for intruders rather than waiting for an alarm.
Huntress's editor note describes the platform as agentic, meaning software in which AI agents take actions. The post itself puts more weight on the human SOC team.
Why IT firms are a special target
Huntress's argument starts with a plain observation. An MSP protects dozens or even hundreds of businesses, and its team usually has remote access to all of them. Its tools hold the keys to its customers' networks.
That makes the MSP an attractive target for attackers. In the company's words, one way in can mean many ways out. A breach at the IT provider does not stay at the provider. It can reach the customers who trusted it to keep them safe.
Huntress also makes a second, more practical point. You should not roll out a product you have never lived with. Using it internally shows how its alerts read on an ordinary afternoon and what it feels like when the SOC contacts you.
What is in the package
Huntress lists several parts of the platform, each with a technical label. Here they are in plain terms:
- Managed EDR (endpoint detection and response): watches laptops and servers for attacks and responds to them.
- Managed ITDR (identity threat detection and response): watches for suspicious activity around logins and accounts.
- Managed SIEM (security information and event management): collects security logs in one place, with support for compliance.
- Managed SAT (security awareness training): teaches staff to avoid common traps.
- Managed ISPM (identity security posture management): tightens the settings around accounts.
- Managed ESPM (endpoint security posture management): does the same for devices. It is currently in early access.
Huntress says the SOC analysts monitor, investigate and respond around the clock. That means a small IT team does not have to handle every alert alone.
How it works in practice
The process has three steps. First, the MSP fills out an internal license request form. Second, it meets with Huntress and deploys the software in its own environment. Third, it uses the platform, then decides whether to bring it to clients.
Huntress says the whole start takes about an hour. That includes 30 minutes with its team to understand how the platform works, followed by account setup and deployment through a trial. The company says it will protect the MSP's internal devices with no strings attached.
The post lists what an MSP can judge during that time:
- Whether the product fits how its team works
- How good the alerts are, and how noisy
- How the SOC investigates and communicates
- Whether the reporting is something it could show a client
- How much effort it takes to keep running
How to read the offer
This is Huntress describing its own program, so treat the claims as the company's account rather than verified fact. The post is open about the business logic. Huntress says it wants to build a healthy business while giving back, and it does not see those goals as in conflict. It also says this is only the start of the program.
Some details are not in the post. It does not say how long the no-cost internal use lasts, or what happens if an MSP decides to become a paying partner. A firm weighing the offer would want those answers in writing.
For a small business that relies on an outside IT provider, the useful lesson is wider than any one vendor. Your provider's own security is part of yours. It is fair to ask what monitors the provider's systems, and whether humans are watching around the clock.
What to watch
- How long the no-cost internal use lasts, and what it costs afterward
- Whether independent reviews confirm Huntress's claims about its SOC and alert quality
- What else Huntress adds to the Neighborhood Watch Program, since it says this is only the start
Try it
If a company handles your IT, ask it what monitors its own systems and whether a person is watching them 24/7. Ask how it would tell you about a breach.
Sources and links
- Reportinghuntress.com: the article we sourced
Liked it? Say why
Add a line for other readers.
No account needed. We never show your email. Comments with links, ads or abuse are held and not shown. Your comment shows after a quick check.
Listen to the AI Wire headlines
Listen to the AI WireListen to our daily AI shows every morning: on your commute, in the shower, wherever you are
Listen to the daily showsFirst reported by huntress.com · Read the original. Written by the SI Agent News Desk from the reporting above.Written with AI from the source above. Every number is checked against the source. Spot a mistake? Corrections.
