Bill Simmons ends The Ringer's ChatGPT partnership following fan backlash
The podcast network pulled its AI-powered segments after listeners and co-hosts expressed discomfort with the technology.
The short version
- The Ringer ended its partnership with OpenAI after listeners rejected AI-powered segments on several shows.
- Simmons faced specific criticism for using AI to mimic the style of deceased film critic Roger Ebert.
- Co-host Sean Fennessey publicly stated he did not like the AI experiments and expressed concerns about recreating his own opinions.
- OpenAI spent an estimated $11.2 million on podcast ads over the last three months according to Podscribe data.
Why it matters
This story shows that even major media personalities find it difficult to balance new technology with audience expectations. It serves as a warning for brands that AI integrations can sometimes alienate the core community they are trying to reach.
A quiet exit from AI content
Bill Simmons has officially ended the sponsorship deal between The Ringer and OpenAI’s ChatGPT. The decision came after the podcast network faced significant pushback from its audience regarding the use of AI-powered segments. These integrations appeared across various shows within the Spotify-owned network earlier this year.
Simmons admitted that the goal was to be an early adopter of new technology. He noted that the network attempted to integrate AI research for baked-in content segments in a similar way to what competitors and professional sports leagues were doing. The move was intended to keep the network at the forefront of media trends.
However, the experiment did not resonate with the listeners as planned. Simmons stated that the network learned almost immediately that these specific segments were not a good fit for their brand. The move highlights the friction that can occur when high-profile media outlets try to blend automated technology with personality-driven content.
The Ebert controversy
One of the most specific points of contention involved a segment on the show "The Rewatchables." During this program, the team used ChatGPT to generate hypothetical film reviews written in the style of Roger Ebert. Ebert was a highly influential critic who passed away in 2013, making the use of AI to mimic his voice particularly sensitive.
The backlash was not limited to the general audience but also extended to the internal team at The Ringer. Sean Fennessey, a co-host of "The Big Picture" and a regular on "The Rewatchables," spoke out against the practice. He shared his disapproval during an appearance on the "Talk Easy With Sam Fragoso" podcast.
Fennessey expressed a clear boundary regarding the use of generative technology in his own work. He stated that he did not want AI to be used to recreate his own opinions after he passes away. This internal dissent suggests that even those creating the content felt uneasy about the ethical and creative implications of the project.
The cost of AI advertising
Despite the cooling of the partnership between Simmons and OpenAI, the broader trend of AI companies spending on podcasts remains strong. Data from Podscribe shows that OpenAI spent an estimated $11.2 million on podcast advertising over the past three months. This indicates a massive financial commitment to reaching listeners through audio platforms.
When combined with spending from rival Anthropic, the total investment in the medium reached over $13 million. These figures suggest that AI companies are aggressively pursuing podcast ads as a primary growth strategy. They are looking for ways to place their tools directly into the ears of everyday consumers.
The Ringer's retreat serves as a notable data point in this broader landscape. It suggests that while the money is available, the execution of these ads is not guaranteed to be successful. If the audience feels the integration is forced or unnatural, the investment may not yield the desired engagement.
Lessons for media brands
The situation at The Ringer provides a clear example of the limits of aggressive AI integration. For many podcast networks, the primary value lies in the human connection and the specific personalities of the hosts. When AI is introduced in a way that feels like a gimmick, it can risk alienating the very community that provides the show's success.
Simmons' experience shows that being early to a technology does not automatically mean it is the right move for a specific brand. The feedback loop between creators and listeners is a powerful tool for determining what content actually works. In this case, the audience signaled that they preferred the human element over the AI-generated prompts.
Moving forward, media companies may need to be more selective about how they use these tools. Instead of broad sponsorships that might feel intrusive, they may look for more subtle ways to use AI that do not disrupt the flow of conversation. The Ringer's move suggests a shift toward more organic, less forced technology adoption.
What to watch
- How other major podcast networks will react to the Ringer's pullback.
- Whether OpenAI will pivot its advertising strategy toward more 'human-centric' integrations.
Try it
Listen to a recent episode of The Bill Simmons Podcast to see how the show's tone has shifted since the removal of the AI segments.
Sources and links
- Reportingthewrap.com: the article we sourced
Liked it? Say why
Add a line for other readers.
No account needed. We never show your email. Comments with links, ads or abuse are held and not shown. Your comment shows after a quick check.
Listen to the AI Wire headlines
Listen to the AI WireListen to our daily AI shows every morning: on your commute, in the shower, wherever you are
Listen to the daily showsFirst reported by thewrap.com · Read the original. Written by the SI Agent News Desk from the reporting above.Written with AI from the source above. Every number is checked against the source. Spot a mistake? Corrections.
