Anthropic strikes first paid news deal with the Associated Press
Anthropic licensed AP data to provide real-time election results, marking a shift from its previous stance on publisher content.
The short version
- Anthropic licensed AP data for real-time election results, its first paid deal with a digital news publisher.
- The deal follows a period where Anthropic argued that using publisher content was legally permissible under fair use.
- OpenAI has already negotiated more than a dozen content licensing deals with major publishers.
- The financial terms, timeframe, and specific scope of the Anthropic-AP agreement remain undisclosed.
- Anthropic is the fourth AI developer reported to have a news-licensing deal, following Amazon, OpenAI, and Google.
Why it matters
This deal signals a transition for Anthropic from relying on web scraping to paying for high-quality, real-time data. It shows that publishers are successfully using both legal pressure and 'digital embargoes' to secure licensing fees from AI developers.
A shift in licensing strategy
Anthropic recently entered into a content and data licensing agreement with the Associated Press (AP). This arrangement was struck just before the US midterm elections and represents the first time the company has paid a digital news publisher for content. While the specific financial details and timeframe of the deal were not disclosed, the partnership allows Anthropic to provide live updates to its users.
This move marks a notable change in the company's public stance regarding media content. In August, digital media executives reported that Anthropic believed its use of publisher content was legally permissible under fair use. The company had previously resisted formal licensing agreements with news organizations, opting instead to rely on its own data collection methods.
The shift appears to be driven by the limitations of an information index that lacks current data. As Mark Stenberg of Adweek noted, "an information index without access to up-to-date data is dramatically limited in its utility." By securing a direct feed, Anthropic can offer more relevant and timely information to its users during major news events.
The election-night connection
The timing of the deal aligns with Anthropic's announcement that its AI, Claude, would show up-to-date election results. Users asking for vote counts would see official numbers directly in their conversations rather than relying on general web information. While Anthropic previously named Democracy Works as a source for voting information, the AP provides the specific type of real-time feed required for such features.
The Associated Press has a history of supplying election data to major technology platforms. In May, the AP announced it would provide OpenAI with vote count results for national, state, and local races through the 2028 general election. This puts Anthropic in a similar position to its primary competitor, which already holds more than a dozen licensing deals with major publishers.
By securing this data, Anthropic addresses a specific technical hurdle where the open web might be insufficient for live reporting. During the midterm elections, the AP counted votes and declared winners in nearly 7,000 races. This high-volume, high-accuracy data is what the licensing deal enables Anthropic to display to its audience.
Publisher pushback and pressure
The deal comes at a time when news publishers are increasingly aggressive in protecting their content. Some publishers have employed a tactic described as a "digital embargo" by blocking Anthropic's crawlers from accessing their sites. This strategy has proven effective in limiting the amount of data the AI company can gather without a formal agreement.
Beyond technical blocks, publishers are also turning to the courts to secure their rights. For example, a Brazilian court recently ordered Meta to stop collecting content from three national press associations to train its AI models. This legal pressure creates a dual-track environment where publishers are seeking both contractual payments and judicial protections against unauthorized scraping.
Anthropic's own history with publishers includes legal challenges and settlements. The company recently approved a $1.5 billion settlement with a class of authors, and it faces ongoing litigation from The New York Times regarding a search index supplied to AI companies. These events highlight the complex and evolving landscape of how AI models interact with copyrighted and proprietary news content.
The business of data inputs
From a business perspective, this deal changes the cost structure of the AI's inputs. Instead of relying on content that a model crawls from the open web, a licensed feed turns news into a supplier contract with a fixed price. This transition helps move the AI company from a model of potential infringement toward a more stable and predictable procurement of high-quality data.
The deal is also seen as a strategic move as Anthropic prepares to go public in the coming weeks. Establishing formal partnerships with reputable news organizations like the AP can help build credibility with investors and regulators. It demonstrates a willingness to participate in the existing media ecosystem rather than attempting to bypass it entirely.
While the specific price of the Anthropic-AP deal is unknown, other examples provide context for the market. Amazon reportedly pays The New York Times between $20 million and $25 million a year for content. These types of agreements are becoming the standard for AI developers who need to provide accurate, real-time information to their users while navigating complex copyright laws.
What to watch
- Whether Anthropic will sign more deals with publishers beyond the Associated Press.
- The specific financial terms and duration of the Anthropic-AP agreement as they are eventually disclosed.
- How other AI developers respond to the 'digital embargo' tactics used by news publishers.
Try it
Check if Claude provides real-time election results or if it attributes the data to the Associated Press.
Sources and links
- ReportingFourWeekMBA: the article we sourced
Liked it? Say why
Add a line for other readers.
No account needed. We never show your email. Comments with links, ads or abuse are held and not shown. Your comment shows after a quick check.
Listen to the AI Wire headlines
Listen to the AI WireListen to our daily AI shows every morning: on your commute, in the shower, wherever you are
Listen to the daily showsFirst reported by FourWeekMBA · Read the original. Written by the SI Agent News Desk from the reporting above.Written with AI from the source above. Every number is checked against the source. Spot a mistake? Corrections.
