Anthropic co-founder predicts a billion virtual scientists will soon emerge
Jack Clark argues that AI will soon allow the world's 10 million human scientists to direct a massive workforce of virtual researchers to accelerate discovery.
The short version
- Research productivity is declining as the cost of finding new scientific ideas increases, a trend seen in both chip density and drug discovery.
- Jack Clark predicts a future where 10 million human scientists direct a billion virtual ones to augment human labor in frontier disciplines.
- Recent tests show AI models finding errors in expert-calculated physics problems that humans had previously verified.
- Anthropic has begun developing interfaces that allow AI agents to operate laboratory equipment remotely and autonomously.
Why it matters
This shift suggests that the primary bottleneck in human progress may move from 'finding' ideas to 'testing' them in the physical world. For the average person, this could mean a faster pace of medical breakthroughs and technological infrastructure development.
AI in the physical laboratory
The transition from digital theory to physical reality is already underway. Anthropic has released a research-preview interface that lets AI agents operate laboratory devices with a programmable interface. This technology is being used to help teams run serial-dilution dose-response experiments about three times faster than previous methods.
In practical applications, researchers have already had to guide AI systems to recognize physical failures, such as foaming in samples, rather than software bugs. Anthropic has also established a wet lab in the San Francisco Bay Area to test these capabilities. However, Clark emphasizes that AI should not be left to perform science entirely unattended for the time being.
As these systems become more capable, the challenge for policymakers will be to prevent downstream bottlenecks. If AI creates an avalanche of new proposed drugs or materials, the world must find ways to move those discoveries out of the lab and into factories and clinics quickly. The focus will shift from generating ideas to the physical logistics of testing and manufacturing them at scale.
The timeline for a new era
Clark believes that the evidence for this technological shift has become convincing within the last year. He argues that AI-driven invention will eventually alter how countries plan infrastructure and improve global health. He suggests that while humans once thought it would take hundreds of thousands of years to reach these milestones, we may achieve them in just a handful of years.
The ultimate goal of this acceleration is to enhance human strengths while reducing weaknesses. Clark frames this as a way for the species to become wiser and more capable. By leveraging virtual scientists, the human workforce can focus on high-level direction while the AI handles the
The roots of the prediction
Jack Clark’s perspective on the speed of AI progress is rooted in science fiction. He draws his framework from the work of writer Vernor Vinge, who predicted in 1993 that intelligence exceeding human capabilities would drive progress at a pace that humans would struggle to follow.
Clark shared the full text of his speech in his Import AI newsletter shortly after the event. His background includes two decades as a journalist covering data centers before he moved to OpenAI in 2016 and eventually co-founded Anthropic.
Evidence of shifting capabilities
The transition toward AI-driven discovery is already showing measurable signs in complex fields. For example, a test called Humanity’s Last Exam, which covers subjects from chemistry to classical literature, launched in early 2025 with an initial top AI score of only 8%.
However, recent performance on specific tasks suggests a rapid climb in capability. In a recent evaluation involving 50 unpublished physics problems, a model's score jumped from the late 80s to 98% after the AI insisted that the human experts' provided answers were actually incorrect.
Validating expert knowledge
The physics evaluation demonstrated that AI can identify errors in calculations that humans had already verified. The authors of the paper described these as "turn-the-crank" research problems, where known techniques are used to generalize an existing result. In several cases, the experts found errors in their own work only after the AI pointed them out.
While the AI agents showed high accuracy on these problems, the researchers noted that the models do not appear to have the same "taste" in problems as humans do. This suggests that while the AI can perform the heavy lifting of calculation and generalization, human oversight remains a key component of the scientific process.
The economic reality of research
Science is currently facing a significant decline in productivity. In the pharmaceutical industry, the number of new drugs approved per billion dollars of research spending has halved roughly every nine years since 1950, a trend known as Eroom’s Law. This reflects a broader reality where the easiest scientific discoveries have already been made, leaving only more expensive and difficult goals remaining.
Because the low-hanging fruit of discovery is gone, reaching further into the unknown requires immense resources. Traditionally, the only way to overcome this was to hire more people, but training new researchers takes years and costs millions of dollars. Clark argues that AI provides a new way to change this economic arithmetic by augmenting human labor in frontier disciplines.
Scaling through software gains
The shift toward AI-driven productivity is already visible in the software industry. Anthropic researchers currently produce almost 10 times as much code as they did during the company's first four years of operation. These gains have also improved the capabilities of AI systems in both cyberdefense and cyberattack, showing how automation can scale technical output.
Clark shared these insights during the IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings in Bangkok and during the 2026 Per Jacobsson Foundation Lecture. He suggests that the next few years will see these types of gains move into other areas. By creating copies of human expertise, the economy will be able to support scientific progress in ways that were previously impossible.
What to watch
- How policymakers will create infrastructure to test the 'avalanche' of AI-generated drugs.
- The development of autonomous laboratory robots that can operate without human supervision.
Try it
Look up 'Eroom's Law' to see how the cost of drug discovery has increased over time.
Sources and links
- OfficialClaude Opus 5.5 anthropic.com
- OfficialModel Hardware Standard anthropic.com
- VideoIMF via YouTube youtube.com
- Paperarxiv.org/abs/2610.16733 arxiv.org
- ReportingR&D World: the article we sourced
Liked it? Say why
Add a line for other readers.
No account needed. We never show your email. Comments with links, ads or abuse are held and not shown. Your comment shows after a quick check.
Listen to the AI Wire headlines
Listen to the AI WireListen to our daily AI shows every morning: on your commute, in the shower, wherever you are
Listen to the daily showsFirst reported by R&D World · Read the original. Written by the SI Agent News Desk from the reporting above.Written with AI from the source above. Every number is checked against the source. Spot a mistake? Corrections.
